• 24 William St, Brookvale NSW 2100
  • Mon - Fri: 7:00 - 17:00

Corrosion Prevention for Marine Applications

Corrosion is the process in which a material, normally a metal deteriorates as a result of chemical reactions. The corrosion of metallic compounds is accelerated by moisture and salt; therefore, marine-related industries are especially susceptible to the effects of corrosion. One US-based study revealed that the negative effects of corrosion cost the United States Navy an estimated $8.63 billion USD in maintenance expenditure [1] during the 2016 fiscal year alone. As a result of this, many marine-based businesses have been investing in methods to reduce the effects of corrosion on their equipment.

 

 

Rust – The result of corroding iron alloys

Rust – The result of corroding iron alloys

 

 

Silicone is a material that has gained a lot of traction in the corrosion-prevention industry, due to its superior resistance to saltwater and UV radiation, low compression set, and wide operating temperature range. Many companies have incorporated silicone seals and O-Rings into their designs to protect metallic components and sensitive electronics from the environment. With this in mind, there are many engineering standards in place to ensure that a silicone seal can withstand given environmental conditions. Examples of these standards include the Ingress protection (IP) rating system, and the MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations standard. Silicone seals have been used to produce products with an IP rating of IP-68 and above, and thus the seal has complete protection against dust, and continuous submersion in water. This means that components protected by an IP-68 rated seal would be heavily protected from the effects of corrosion. Similarly, silicone seals have been used to pass testing under the rigorous MIL-STD-810G standards of testing in categories such as Humidity, Solar Radiation, Salt Fog, and Extreme Temperatures.

At Jehbco Manufacturing, we produce custom engineered silicone extrusions, which are used in all forms of sealing and corrosion-prevention applications. Our staff can provide expert consultation on what solution can be applied to achieve a certain standard, whether it be an IP rating, Military standard, or otherwise. For help selecting a material for your application, consult our applications page and contact us with any questions.

 

References

  1. Herzberg, E., Chan, T., Guo, S., Morris, A., Stevenson, A. and Stroh, R. (2018). Estimated Impact of Corrosion on Cost and Availability of DoD Weapon Systems. [online] Corrdefense.org. Available at: https://www.corrdefense.org/static/media/content/11393.000.00T1-March2018-Ecopy.pdf [Accessed 16 Nov. 2018].
Read More
Simulations on Hyperelastic Materials

Simulations on Hyperelastic Materials

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is extensively used at Jehbco to simulate and develop seals. We currently hold over 2600 extrusion designs which have been developed over our four-decades of operations in the silicones industry. Jehbco can both modify our existing designs to suit your application or engineer a new design for you. Our expertise in non-linear multi body contact problems help us develop virtual gland-seal interactions in our software and check for operational validity.

 

 

Hyperelastic simulation of a facade joint seal

Hyperelastic simulation of a facade joint seal

 

Hyperelastic models are used to represent silicone rubber models in simulations. To develop numerical models of elastomers various physical tests are carried out such as uniaxial and biaxial tension tests in order to experimentally determine certain parameters for the numerical models. These tests help to incorporate the mechanical properties and thus the behavior of the elastomer in the model.

The boundary conditions of the problem are defined from the customer’s input. These include the operating conditions, loading and movements. These are given as problem-constraints and the model behaves accordingly.

Iterations of various designs are simulated to understand how the seal or gasket behaves under different loads and constraints. Then, the most optimum design is chosen and dies are manufactured to its exact dimensions.

Some of the innovative applications for which we have run simulations include seals for building facades, pressure vessels, washing chambers, panel joining, and gasket compressions.

References

  1. V. V. Mozgalev and N. R. Prokopchuk, \The choice of best-fit mathematical models of the
    behaviour of rubber compounds for finite element analysis,” Kauchuk i Rezina, vol. 1, pp.
    32{34, 2014.
  2. ANSYS, \Hyperelasticity,” Tech. Rep.
  3. \Nonlinear finite element analysis of elastomers,” Tech. Rep. 4, 2010. [Online]. Available:
    http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0045794987900162
Read More
Jehbco’s closed cell silicone sponge in a variety of profiles.

What is Jehbco’s closed cell silicone sponge, and why is it so popular?

Silicone sponge is one of Jehbco’s most unique materials, finding applications in a variety of industrial applications from lighting gaskets to dry seals and oven manufacturing. The most important feature of a closed-cell silicone sponge is its extreme compressibility, which allows it to form airtight seals with very low sealing loads. This feature combined with silicone’s naturally ability to withstand high and low temperatures (-60°C to 200°C) and the increased insulating properties of sponge rubber makes silicone sponge an exceptionally versatile elastomer suitable for many different applications.

 

Jehbco’s closed cell silicone sponge in a variety of profiles.

Jehbco’s closed cell silicone sponge in a variety of profiles.

 

Silicone sponge is what is known as an expanded elastomer. Many elastomers can be formulated into a kind of sponge by incorporating air into the bulk of the elastomer during the manufacturing process. Typically, this air is visible on the final product as well-dispersed bubbles, which can vary in size depending on the cell structure. This incorporation of air increases the softness and compressibility of the elastomer while simultaneously lowering its density. The amount of air and overall consistency of the air inclusions determines the cell structure of the sponge, which has significant impact on the mechanical properties of the final sponge.

Two different kinds of sponge rubber can be made depending on the cell structure of the sponge itself. The first is called an open-cell sponge, which is the same kind of cell structure as the sponges used for dishwashing. In an open-cell sponge, all the inclusions of air are connected by channels, which allows fluids to flow through the sponge. This is crucial when the absorption or passage of fluids through the sponge is required for the desired application. Open-cell sponges can be very heavily compressed upon the application of pressure and will expand back readily as air can easily flow back into the air pockets of the material. However, open-cell sponge is not suitable for the formation of air-tight seals.

In a closed-cell silicone sponge, all the inclusions of air are completely enclosed by rubber. This means that the air inclusions are completely inaccessible to any fluids or microorganisms. These air pockets can still be deformed by the application of pressure, in the same fashion as a rubber ball can be compressed, providing significantly improved compressibility over solid silicone. This allows air-tight seals to be easily formed. To maximise compressibility and also improve the appearance of the sponge, smaller, more consistently shaped and dispersed air inclusions will form a higher quality sponge rubber. In accordance with ASTM D1056, a closed cell sponge must not absorb more than 5% of its weight in water, while a sponge that absorbs more than this value is classified as open-cell.

Typically, closed-cell sponge rubber is made using a chemical blowing agent, which decomposes during the curing process to produce gas, which mechanically expands to form small inclusions in the bulk rubber. Over time, air slowly through the bulk of the silicone, replacing these gasses with air. However, due to the unique chemistry and processing temperatures of silicone rubber, many traditional blowing agents are chemically incompatible with silicones. Typically, silicone sponge employs a peroxide curing system together with a carefully formulated mix of additives and blowing agents to produce a high quality closed-cell silicone sponge with a low density and a consistent cell structure. As can be expected, the blowing process causes severe expansion of the silicone profile, so it is extremely difficult to manufacture specific profiles. Jehbco is one of few silicone manufacturers that have dedicated extensive amounts of research and resources to perfecting the sponge making process so that even the most intricate custom profiles can be made. Jehbco’s sponge can be made into a wide range of profiles, or custom-made to suit your requirements, and is available in three softness grades (soft, medium and firm) depending on your preferences.

Ultimately, if you are looking for a soft, low-density material with excellent compressibility and extreme chemical and heat stability, enquire about our closed-cell silicone sponge. Jehbco has spent many years formulating and developing closed-cell silicone sponge and have consistently impressed our customers with our high-quality sponge rubber. For help selecting a material for your application, consult our applications page and contact us with any questions.

Read More

Silicone vs Neoprene

Choosing an elastomer for a new design or application can be overwhelming due to the wide range of materials available on the market today. We at Jehbco are often asked to help consult our customers on what elastomer is the right choice for their application.  Are our 100% silicone products the right choice for you? Or would a different material be more appropriate?

In this article, we’ll explore the different properties of silicone and neoprene, and what applications each material would be best suited for. Silicone and neoprene are both commonly used materials for o-rings, gaskets, seals, tubing and membranes. While both elastomers may be used to create similar products, the specific application and environment will ultimately determine whether neoprene or silicone will be the better choice for you. The table below summarises some of the key differences between the two materials.

 

Neoprene Silicone
-40 °C to 110 °C -50 °C to 230 °C
Good compression set Excellent compression set
Great weather resistance Excellent weather resistance
Approx. tensile strength 12 MPa Approx. tensile strength 5 MPa
Excellent abrasion resistance Poor abrasion resistance
Not compatible with: concentrated acids, hydrocarbon fuels, aromatic hydrocarbons, oxygenated solvents. Not compatible with: hydrocarbon fuels, alkalis and acids, steam over 121 °C, trichloroethylene, aromatic hydrocarbons.
Compatible with: hot and cold water, alkalis, dilute acids, steam, refrigerants, some oils and greases Compatible with: oils, brake fluids, hot and cold water, salt water, high molecular weight chlorinated hydrocarbons, fire resistant hydraulic fluid, ozone.

 

Both neoprene and silicone can operate at extremely low temperatures, although silicone is the far better option in high temperature environments. Silicone can resist intermittent temperatures of up to 230°C, or up to 280°C if a heat stabiliser is added into the raw material.

 

Silicone vs Neoprene

Silicone vs Neoprene

 

Neoprene has high tensile strength and excellent abrasion resistance, whereas silicone has good tensile strength, but poor abrasion resistance. For dynamic applications with friction, neoprene would most likely be a better option.  With this being said, silicone can be formulated to have improved tear strength, making it an ideal choice for applications such as vacuum sheeting and peristaltic pumps. Silicone also has the superior compression set, which makes it a better choice for applications requiring a long lasting, reusable seal, especially in high temperature environments.

While silicone has an excellent resistance to ozone and UV, neoprene can also resist ozone and UV to a degree, making both options viable for most outdoor applications. Neoprene is more suited for any applications that require contact with alkali compounds or dilute acids, while silicone is more suitable for applications that require contact with high temperature oils. Neither material is compatible with hydrocarbon fuel, but silicone is resistant to automotive brake fluids.

It is clear to see that there is merit in using either neoprene and silicone, depending on what physical properties you require and the operational environment.  For help selecting a material for your application, consult our applications page and contact us with any questions.

Read More
Mechanical Testing & Simulation

Mechanical Testing & Simulation

At Jehbco, research is constantly carried out to understand the behaviour of silicone rubber and its properties under various conditions to achieve control over the entire product lifecycle. Silicone rubber is a viscoelastic amorphous polymer which simultaneously exhibits internal resistance to flow as well as molecular positional memory under deformation over a temperature range specific to the material. Thanks to these properties silicone rubber can be extensively used in sealing applications.

Mechanical sealing is important in equipment with movable parts. The compartmentalisation between sections of machinery or equipment is achieved using rubber gaskets and seals.

For the manufactured silicone rubber product to perform the functions it is designed for, it should retain the design properties under operating conditions. The form or shape of the seal or gaskets, deformation behaviour, hardness, coefficient of friction, and compression set define the final properties of the product.

 

Tensile testing machine

Tensile testing machine

In comparison to materials that behave linearly under load, understanding viscoelastic materials is challenging. Below are the differences between stiffness, strength and hardness and their corresponding indicating parameters which are generally used to describe the property of the rubber product.

  • Stiffness is an indicator of the tendency for an element to return to its original form after being subjected to a force. (Compression set)
  • Strength measures how much stress can be applied to an element before it deforms permanently or fractures. (Tensile strength)
  • Hardness measures a material’s resistance to surface deformation. (Shore hardness)

Hyperelastic numerical models are used to represent various non-linear material behaviour under different conditions. Hyperelastic models for expressing the behaviour of elastomers are modelled as incompressible (i.e. changes in shape but the overall volume remains same), isotropic (i.e. internal properties such as stress are uniform in all directions) and homogeneous. The model is validated against the customer’s specimen or initial test piece developed at our facility. Finite element analysis is carried out using SolidWorks using which the developed Hyperelastic model is computationally tested. The results are then indicative of the stiffness, strength and hardness characteristics which is used in product development.

Our understanding of non-linear behaviour of the material is key to our product development capabilities. Developments are constantly being made to pour in-house testing facility improving both simulation and physical testing capabilities.

We have developed a software to calculate custom size of O-rings and butt-joined chord type gaskets, adding to Jehbco’s expertise in providing solutions for non-standard applications. The software is a result of comprehensive design-engineering and experimental testing carried out by our research and development team.

The mechanical testing and research facility at Jehbco is equipped to meet industrial product testing standards for variety of applications, making sure the customer gets the best engineered product.

For further information or advice about our product testing and development, please review Jehbco’s articles and contact us with any questions.

 

References

  1. Villasenor-Ochoa, H. (2017). Engineering Fundamentals Refresh: Strength vs Stiffness vs Hardness | Fictiv – Hardware Guide. [online] Fictiv.com. Available at: https://www.fictiv.com/hwg/design/engineering-fundamentals-refresh-strength-vs-stiffness-vs-hardness [Accessed 25 Jul. 2018].
  2. Dickey, R. (1973). Nonlinear elasticity. New York [etc.]: Academic Press.
  3. A.N., G. (1994). Science and Technology of Rubber. 2nd ed. ACADEMIC PRESS. Published by Elsevier Inc., pp.1-22.
Read More

Replacing Toxic Silicone Sealants with Solid Silicone Seals

Room temperature vulcanising (RTV) silicone sealants are a popular and versatile joining material frequently used in the construction industry.  These ready-to-use silicones cure at room temperature by reacting with moisture in the atmosphere, forming a strong and stable join. However, this curing process produces unwanted, toxic by-products which are released into the immediate surroundings. Excessive short term and long term exposure to these by-products have significant associated health risks, including suspected carcinogenicity and damage to the eyes, skin and respiratory system.

The most common kind of RTV silicone sealants are acetoxy and neutral curing silicones. Acetoxy curing silicone sealants produce acetic acid upon curing, emitting a pungent, sour odour resembling vinegar. While these sealants are commonly used for domestic applications and glass or ceramic substrates, the corrosiveness of acetic acid makes acetoxy curing RTV silicone unsuitable for many substrates used in construction applications. Neutral-curing silicones do not form corrosive by-products, allowing them to be used with a wide range of substrates. Oxime curing silicones are a commonly used weather resistant neutral curing sealant, producing methyl ethyl ketoxime (MEKO), also known as butan-2-one oxime, as a by-product upon curing. While MEKO is non-corrosive, it is important to understand the significant health risks that are associated with exposure to this substance.

 

 

Hazardous chemicals associated with silicone wet seals

Hazardous chemicals associated with silicone wet seals

 

The short-term MEKO exposure risks from using oxime silicone sealants are associated with its acute toxicity upon skin contact, eye contact or inhalation [1, 2]. At low concentrations generated from oxime cure, skin contact may cause some skin irritation or facilitate an allergic dermal reaction. Eye contact is severe, causing serious eye irritation upon contact with fumes and irreversible eye damage upon concentrated contact [3]. While the acute toxicity through inhalation is classified as low, respiratory irritation may occur along with significant long exposure risks. Acute oral toxicity is low, but is not as relevant for sealant applications.

 

Even more concerning is the carcinogenicity of MEKO over a long exposure period. MEKO is classified as a Category 3 carcinogen by Safe Work Australia [1, 2]. Substances with this classification usually carry an associated ‘suspected of causing cancer’ warning in accordance with Australian Work Health and Safety (WHS) legislation. The carcinogenicity study exposed rats to 374 ppm doses via inhalation over 18 months [3]. Upon the closing of the study, degeneration of the respiratory system was observed as well as significant increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas, the most common kind of liver tumour [3]. These results, along with other studies of MEKO, are strong indications of the carcinogenicity and long term exposure risks of MEKO.

It is important to understand the risks associated with using wet silicone sealants such that they can be minimised and effectively controlled. The maximum MEKO exposure limit recommended by the American Industrial Hygiene Association is 36 mg/m3 (10ppm) [2]. Workspaces must be well ventilated to keep the concentration of MEKO below this level, along with all other personal protective equipment recommended by the sealant manufacturer, in order to use oxime based sealants in a safe manner. While there are other neutral curing silicones being developed that have lower carcinogenic risk, including alkoxy and amine curing sealants, each continue to produce by-products that are harmful to human health. Inherently, the use of any wet sealant constitutes some form of exposure risk to human health and safety.

While exposure limits and personal protective equipment provide a basic level of risk reduction, those familiar with the Hierarchy of Hazard Controls will know that elimination and substitution are more favourable and effective methods of risk reduction. Reducing the quantity of wet sealant used can substantially reduce workplace risk by reducing the amount of toxic by-products released into the surroundings. A suitable replacement for wet silicone seals are dry gap sealing with a solid silicone join.

Jehbco’s Quick Joint Extrusion is a solid silicone dry seal that does not produce any vapours and has excellent binding strength and better durability than wet seals. As a wet seal replacement, quick joint silicone also minimises installation time significantly and provides a polished, more visually appealing finish to the join. Because the installation time is reduced, the workplace exposure to wet sealant by-products is also reduced significantly. A lower exposure time further minimises health risk and promotes a safer, more productive working environment.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Safe Work Australia. Hazardous Substances Information System (HSIS).  [cited 16 April 2018]; Available from: http://hsis.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/HazardousSubstance.
  2. National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. HUMAN HEALTH TIER II ASSESSMENT FOR 2-Butanone, oxime CAS Number: 96-29-7.  [cited 16 April 2018]; Available from: https://www.nicnas.gov.au/chemical-information/imap-assessments/imap-assessment-details?assessment_id=103#cas-A_96-29-7.
  3. REACH Dossier. Butanone Oxime (96-29-7).  [cited 16 April 2018]; Available from: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/registered-substances.
Read More

Silicone Mixing Quality

At Jehbco, we ensure that every product is of the highest quality before being sent to our customers. Raw silicone must be fed through a roller mill to mix in any extra additives or colouring, but insufficient mixing can lead to a poor-quality product. For example, if an additive to improve fire resistance is not properly mixed into the raw silicone, there may be portions of the final product that may not be fire resistant. Hence, it is crucial that the quality of mixing during the milling stage of silicone rubber production is constantly monitored, to ensure a homogenous product.

 

 

Figure 1: Raw silicone being passed through a roller mill for mixing [1]

Figure 1: Raw silicone being passed through a roller mill for mixing [1]

One method of measuring the mixing quality during the milling stage is to calculate the coefficient of variation of additive particles in samples of the mixed silicone material. The coefficient of variation is a percentage that represents how similar each sample is to one another. Samples of the mixed silicone product are taken and analysed under a scanning-electron microscope (SEM). The high magnification of the SEM will allow the user to determine the approximate concentration of additive particles in each sample, which can be used to determine the coefficient of variation, as shown in figure 2 below.

 

Figure 2: Coefficient of Variation Equation

Figure 2: Coefficient of Variation Equation

 

 

A low coefficient of variation means that the amount of additive in each sample is similar, which suggests a well-mixed product. Thus, the quality of mixing can be determined using the coefficient of variation. Table 1 below correlates the calculated coefficient of variation of the samples, to the quality of mixing in the mixed silicone product. For example, if the coefficient of variation of the samples is between 10-15%, the quality of mixing in the mixed product is good, but can be improved by increasing the number of passes through the roller mill.

 

Table 1: Correlation between correlation of variation and quality of mixing

Coefficient of Variation (%) Quality of Mixing Corrective Actions
<10 Excellent
10-15 Good Increase number of roller mill passes
15-20 Fair Increase number of roller mill passes

Inspect roller mills for wear

Alter sequencing of additives

>20 Poor Consult raw material supplier or mill manufacturer for professional advice

 

By calculating the coefficient of variation, and hence, the quality of mixing in the mixed product, a high quality of silicone rubber product can be consistently maintained. At Jehbco, we strive to provide only the highest quality of silicone products for your needs.

For further information or advice about which silicone rubber best suits your application, please review the Jehbco website www.jehbco.com.au, and contact us with any questions.

 

References:

[1] Medical Design. (2013, April 3). [Roller Mill with Raw Silicone]. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from http://medicaldesign.com/silicone/new-silicone-elastomer-offers-wider-processing-flexibility

 

 

Read More

Silicone Tubing for Peristaltic Pumps

Jehbco’s Silicone has a number of excellent properties, making it a good choice for many applications.  Jehbco has many years of experience designing and manufacturing parts for a wide range of applications, from aircraft parts to food and medical tubing.  One area where we have expertise is peristaltic pump tubing.

Peristaltic pumps are used in sensitive applications where fluid cannot be exposed to pump components.  They are often used when the fluid must remain sterile (such as in medical applications), and when the fluid is very aggressive or corrosive.  A peristaltic pump works by squeezing fluid through a flexible tube.  The tubing must be able to withstand thousands of squeeze repetitions and also not react with or absorb the fluid being pumped.  Jehbco’s medical grade silicone is an ideal material for peristaltic pump tubing.

 

Peristaltic pump

Peristaltic pump

 

Jehbco manufactures medical grade tubing from pure silicone.  Our silicone is inert and non-absorbent, making it suitable for most medical fluids, acids, bases and many other chemicals.  Furthermore, our silicone tubing can withstand the repeated squeezing that occurs in peristaltic pumps with minimum fatigue.  Jehbco’s tubing meets pharmaceutical industry standards and is ready to install in pharmaceutical pumping applications.

Peristaltic pumps are just one of the many applications of Jehbco’s high-quality silicone products.  For help with the design of your own application, review our website at www.Jehbco.com.au and contact our sales team with any questions.

Image Credit & Thanks: Wikipedia

Read More
O-Ring Design with Jehbco: Sneak Peek

O-Ring Design with Jehbco: Sneak Peek

O-Rings are an extremely common and effective seal, consisting of a rubber ring with a circular profile, which is pressed into a rectangular groove or gland.  Most applications can use a standard, off-the-shelf o-ring, but for those special applications that need a non-standard o-ring, here at Jehbco we can manufacture a custom o-ring perfect for the task.

Several standards exist for o-ring design, the most common being AS5857.  These standards simplify design of o-ring seals, giving dimensions for both the rectangular gland and the o-ring itself.  But some applications require a non-standard o-ring – very large seals, seals for existing non-standard glands and seals for non-rectangular glands, for example.  When the seal is non-standard, the design is a nightmare – working out the gland size, the seal size, checking the seal squeeze and fit all require many design iterations and physical tests.  Here at Jehbco, we’re working to simplify the design process with our in-house o-ring design software.

 

Figure-1 Testing our face seal designs with Jehbco Silicones

Figure-1 Testing our face seal designs with Jehbco Silicones

 

We are conducting physical tests of our automated o-ring designs, to ensure that the values our software gives work in the real world.  Of course, new designs will still require physical testing, but we aim to reduce the number of test iterations required to produce the final design, and eliminate all the tedious hand calculations required for non-standard o-ring designs.

 

Figure-2 A sneak peek of our o-ring design software with Jehbco Silicones

Figure-2 A sneak peek of our o-ring design software with Jehbco Silicones

 


Our software is still under development, but stay tuned for more news as we put our design software into service.  For more information on our products and services, review our website www.jehbco.com.au and contact us with any questions.

Read More